We're biting our fingernails now, because we don't know whether the court of appeal let him out on just traditional bail detention issues, because in our judgment, neither proper procedures nor proper quanta of evidence were utilized, or whether it was on the basis of the First Amendment. From the client's perspective, we're delighted he's out; we certainly hope it was on the basis of the First Amendment because that would preclude their trying to put him back in for alleged obscenity violations until and unless a jury comes to a conclusion that he violated the law, but we just don't know. John Weston