The courts demand that every religious person must accommodatea single atheist who might be 'offended' at the favorable mentionof God's name (unfavorable or blasphemous mentions, we are told,are protected by the same First Amendment that prohibits favorablementions). But no atheist can be forced to accommodate a singlereligious person who might be offended by the atheist's unbelief,or who wants to be part of the pluralism and diversity aboutwhich liberals regularly speak, but which is not broad enough toembrace people who believe in God. Cal Thomas